Scientific dissemination in the Angolan press
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37293/sapientiae81.08Keywords:
Science Communication, Press, Scientific Culture, ScienceAbstract
Science communication in the press is an old activity; the frictions between scientists and journalists that always have characterized science communication have been overcome since scientists made journalists privileged partners to communicate science. The research proposes to analyze the indications that are embodied in evidence of science communication in the Angolan press; and relies on the theoretical support of Schäfer (2011), Mendonça (2017), and Fonseca (2018). Thus, the research seeks to answer the question - is there evidence embodied in actions that promote scientific culture in the Angolan press? To answer it, a qualitative and quantitative methodology was used to analyze 200 science articles, of which 100 from the year 2019 and 100 from 2021 were taken from three national newspapers - Journal de Angola, OPaís, and ANGOP PRESS. Results suggest that in the Angolan press, seem to be no regular spaces to communicate science; there is an absence of the press articulation with science-producing institutions. Besides, science news in the media is characterized by the significant presence of politicians giving speeches on science and technology policies; almost nothing is reported on scientific results produced in Higher Education Institutions. We hope the present text will strengthen the debate on promoting scientific culture in Angola since the press and other institutions do not present indicators for that to happen.References
Amaral, Sara Vaarela (2015). Desafios da Inovação da Comunicação de Ciência em Portugal. Tese de doutoramento. Doutoramento em Comunicação da Ciência. Universidade Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/29550
Bardin, Laurence (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70. Portugal.
Burns, Terry., O’Connor John & Stocklmayer Susan (2003). Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition. Public Understand of Science Vol. 12 Nº2, England (Pp. 183–202). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09636625030122004
Campenhoudt, Luc Van & Quivy, Jacques Marquet e Raymond (2017).Manual de investigação em Ciências Sociais. Gravita. (5ª Ed.) Portugal.
Cardoso, Carlos (2011). Da possibilidade das ciências sociais em África. Como Fazer Ciências Sociais em África. Vol. 3 Brasil (Pp. 125-143). https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/44201/1/Uma%20perspectiva%20cosmopolita%20sobre%20os%20estudos%20africanos_85-108.pdf
Classen, George (2011). Science and the media in South Africa: Reflecting a dirty mirror. South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research Vol. 37 Nº 3 South Africa (Pp. 351-366). https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2011.622288
Fonseca, Maria Rachel Fróes (2018). A ciência popularmente tratada, e não a ciência profissionalmente discutida tal será o nosso sistema de redação: Imprensa e vulgarização das ciências no Brasil na segunda metade do século XIX. Vista Historia, Belo Horizonte Vol. 34 Nº 66 Brasil (Pp. 637-668). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-87752018000300004
Fonseca, Rui Brito (2009). A ciência e a Tecnologia n´A Capital: da página de fait-divers à pagina de ciência. CIES e-Working Papers (Pp. 1-42). https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/1317/3/CIES-WP59%20_Fonseca.pdf
Lucas, Jorge Alexandre (2011). Análise do discurso de divulgação científica na imprensa Catarinense. Palhoça. Brasil. https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/3302
Mendonça, Helena (2017). Jornalismo na contra-corrente da divulgação científica. Revista de Comunicação vol. 6 Nº 1 Portugal (Pp. 15-349).https://revistacomunicando.ubi.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/208
Oliveira, Cristina Isabel Albino (2013). Discurso de divulgação da ciência na imprensa escrita: o desastre de Fukushima nos jornais Correio da manhã e Público. Dissertação de mestrado. Mestrado em comunicação de Ciência. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/10108
Oliveira, Fabíola (2001). Difusão e divulgação: os desafios do jornalismo científico. Comunicação pública e cultura científica. PARCERIAS ESTRATÉGICAS Vol. 12 Nº 3 Brasil (Pp. 201-208). http://seer.cgee.org.br/index.php/parcerias_estrategicas/article/viewFile/202/196.
Peters, Hans Peter (1995). The interaction of jorunalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflit between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society Vol. 17 Nº 1995 England (Pp. 31-48). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016344395017001003
Ponce, Ana Rita de Heaton Ayres (2018). O papel dos comunicados de imprensa no sensacionalismo em notícias de ciência. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/54180
Sánchez-Mora, Carmen, Elaine Reynoso-Haynes, Ana María Sánchez Mora, e Julia Tangüeña Parga (2015). Public communication of science in Mexico: past, present and future of a profession. Public Understand of Science Vol. 24 Nº 1 México (Pp. 38-52). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963662514527204
Salgado, Aline Silva (2018). A Revolta contra a vacina: A vulgarização
científica na grande imprensa no ano de 1994. Casa de Oswaldo
Cruz. Brasil. https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/31112
Schäfer, Mike Soul (2011). Sources, characteristics and effects of mass
media Communication on science: a review of the literature, current trends and areas for future research. Sociology Compass Vol. 6 Nº 5 England (Pp. 399-412). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x
Vilelas, João. (2017). Investigação: o processo da construção do conhecimento.Edições Sílabos. Portugal.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The content of the publications are of absolute responsibility of the authors and not of the Oscar Ribas University or the SAPIENTIAE Journal. The Journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright of the papers.This journal is Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.